|
|
Group Pushes Big-Box Restrictions
By KATIE MELONE
Courant Staff Writer
September 28 2005
SIMSBURY -- A residents group's push to discourage the construction of large
retail stores in town was met by a standing ovation Tuesday night at a packed
planning commission meeting.
The group, Simsbury Homeowners Advocating Responsible Expansion, hopes the
commission will incorporate its anti-big box store provisions in the town's
plan of development. The plan is being revised and will eventually be presented
in public hearings.
Duncan MacKay, a lawyer who lives on
SHARE, which claims to have 1,200 members spread across town, began mobilizing
against so-called big box stores this summer when a regional developer began to
vet with residents his plan to build a shopping center on the Connecticut Light
& Power property in the south end of town.
It is unclear exactly which large retailers would inhabit a retail center on
the property, or what the center might look like. Michael Goman, Konover &
Associates Inc. CEO and a school board member, has yet to submit a formal
application to the town's land-use boards. He has said a "large
format" retail store is necessary for the success of any retail center,
and that it would be tastefully done using design details in keeping with the
character of the town.
Goman, who attended a school board meeting also scheduled for Tuesday night,
declined to comment for this story.
MacKay's presentation Tuesday evoked whoops and hollers, sounds not typically
heard at the commission's staid meetings.
"I don't recall any other standing ovation," Chairman John Loomis
said of the response to the presentation.
Speaking for his group, MacKay said the town should consider limiting retail
stores to 30,000 square feet and that Route 10 should remain a two-lane road,
two recommendations that, if implemented, could essentially prevent any large
national retailer from coming to town. By comparison, MacKay said, Andy's, a
supermarket in the center of town, is 26,000 square feet.
The group says it is not opposed to development in general, and would support
office buildings or active adult housing for retired seniors in lieu of
large-scale retail, which they view as "anathema" to the town.
"It's a place whose character ought to be preserved and ought to be
protected," MacKay said.
The group also brought in Fred Carstensen, a
For example, he said, they can often result in pressure for further development
in the same area, and can lead to lower property values in and around the
shopping center, undercutting any benefit first envisioned.
In 1999, the property became the subject of an intense political battle after
the town's planning commission rejected a plan to subdivide a portion of the
property for an office park. Some town officials contended that the decision
cost
Copyright
2005, Hartford Courant
|
|